Django Unchained

Django Unchained
Directed by Quentin Tarantino
Written by Quentin Tarantino
with Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio
2012

I always have to watch Tarantino films at least twice before I can be sure of what I think of them; they tend to be a bit dazzling first time round, so full of twisting conversations and weird, geeky quirks that it’s hard to tell whether you’ve been properly satisfied by the experience or if it was just good for a bit of fun. Inglourious Basterds was hugely enjoyable in the cinema, but subsequent rewatches have revealed it as a sequence of brilliantly staged scenes – and some not so brilliant – with little to keep it going once everything’s familiar. (There are plenty who’d say this about all of his work, of course.) This means that in some ways this review is premature, because I might watch Django Unchained again and completely change my opinion. But, right now, I’m pretty set on this being a massive artistic success.

Emphatically set a few years before the American Civil War breaks out, the film opens with a group of slaves being transported from market to their new workplace, when a mysterious German man (Christoph Waltz), claiming to be a dentist, approaches the party from the night. This is Dr King Schultz, who is in fact a bounty hunter on the trail of three brothers, and he needs one of the slaves, Django (Jamie Foxx), to identify them. Once he has bought Django, he surprises him by proposing an agreement instead of merely taking him into service, and they set off to find the fugitives. It turns out Django recognises the men for painful reasons, and ends up impressing Dr Schultz by taking charge once they find them. The German’s fascination grows upon hearing the story of how Django’s wife, Broomhilda (Kerry Washington), has been sold on separately to his new companion, who is now determined to track her down. Dr Schultz tells Django the story of his wife’s namesake, Brünnhilde, a character in the Völsunga Saga, the German folktale where the hero rescues a princess from a mountain top. He makes a further deal with Django: train as his bounty hunting assistant, and he will aid him in his search and rescue.

Despite the mythical reference, the story is pure Western pulp, full of shoot outs, vendettas and showdowns. It’s the kind of thing that’s never original but also never fails to be satisfying, as long as it’s done with wit and verve, and Tarantino not only has that but also a thing for unexpectedly killing people off, and a knack for twisting a cliché, so that you’re still never entirely sure where things are going to go. More notably, this is his first effort as writer-director that isn’t split into chapters or non-chronological sequence, the trademark that he pulled off so spectacularly with Pulp Fiction, got away with in the Kill Bill diptych, largely because of its odd computer-game structure, and which stops Inglourious Basterds being as good as it could have been. (Death Proof is, I guess, itself a chapter in a bigger project, so it doesn’t really count.) Django Unchained has a linear structure, the classic three acts, and to be honest it’s a relief to see the man can actually make a “normal” film. And while it’s obviously full of the usual cultural references and anachronistic music, there’s something far more controlled and relevant about them. In short, it feels like Tarantino has actually made an original piece of work, rather than a mad concoction of stuff he likes. Not only is Django Unchainedhis most consistent and satisfying film for ages, but, Elmore Leonard adaptation Jackie Brown aside, it might even be the one where he finally emerges from the shadow cast by Pulp Fiction.
Tom

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The Impossible

The Impossible
Directed by Juan Antonio Bayona
Written by Sergio G. Sánchez and María Belón
with Naomi Watts, Tom Holland, Ewan McGregor
2012

The Impossible centres on the experiences of a family holidaying in Thailand over Christmas 2004, the year an earthquake in the Indian Ocean caused the deadliest tsunami on record to sweep through South-East Asia. The instant impulse when you see this sort of thing advertised is of course to avoid a schmaltzy cash-in on a human story that ‘deserves to be told’, but, ignoring that aspect of the film, this is pretty gripping.

There’s not much to explain about the premise: the Bennett family are spending Christmas at a Thai resort, only for a huge tidal wave to sweep through the land on Boxing Day, killing or maiming thousands and separating the family. The mother, Maria (Naomi Watts), and her eldest son Lucas (Tom Holland) find themselves in a waterlogged wasteland, apparently miles from where they were first hit, while her husband Henry (Ewan McGregor), and two younger children Thomas (Samuel Joslin) and Simon (Oaklee Pendergast), are left among the wreckage of their hotel. From there each group must find safety and medical attention, and hopefully find out what happened to their missing loved ones.

Apart from being comparatively fortunate and featuring one amazing coincidence, the family’s story can’t really be said to ‘deserve’ cinematic treatment more than that of any of the thousands of other families who actually were torn apart that day, except that it allows for a happy ending. I personally never really buy that explanation for productions based on recent, real human tragedies, unless they’re going to give all the profits to a survivors’ fund or something. Yet for what it is, The Impossible is a respectful and actually quite restrained dramatic thriller. McGregor and Watts may be big names but, onscreen at least, never seem particularly attention-seeking, and apart from being unnaturally photogenic do a good job of not making themselves the centre of the film. Similarly, the script might be by-the-numbers but it never makes this family’s story seem somehow more important than the rest of the carnage, and the direction (by The Orphanage’s Juan Antonio Bayona) is imaginative without drawing attention to itself. The shots of bodies being swept along underwater amidst swirling jagged debris are heart-stopping.

So it’s pretty insubstantial. And morally disingenuous. But for all that quite a lot of care has gone into making it, and into making it sensitively, and it’s undeniably powerful in its depiction of the tsunami’s aftermath: the film is explicit in its depiction of the death toll and the horrific injuries people sustained, but you never get the sense those things are being pored over for shock value.
Tom

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

McCullin



McCullin
Directed by David Morris and Jacqui Morris
2013



At the crossroads between retrospective, memoir and painful confession, McCullin presents the staggering stoicism of one of Britain’s most acclaimed and uncompromising war photographers, Don McCullin. 

Directed by McCullin’s former assistant Jacqui Morris and her brother David, the documentary is striking in its simple, effective structure. Apart from some shots of London and its destitute and eccentric inhabitants, the documentary follows the photographer’s career from battleground to battleground, as he documented the most exacerbated civil wars, the massacres and the political conflicts of those years. Journalistic footage brings back to life on the screen the mad euphoria, the danger and the unleashed violence of those moments, against which McCullin's photographs stand as crystallized moments of silence, breaching out of insanity. 

But this series of wars brings more than chronological order to the matter. As McCullin himself observed, if he could not be in one war, there was always another one somewhere else, waiting for him and his camera. Out of the haunting, distressing mosaic of human suffering his photographs have delivered over the years, appears the universal, baffling footprint of men’s cruelty. 

Through their tribute to McCullin, the Morris’s build a nostalgic monument to the years of independent, daring and committed photojournalism. Published in series and with text in The Observer and the Sunday Times, McCullin’s photographs had the ambition to render war present in the homes of the middle class. They seemed to want to narrow the gaps of a more and more media-connected, yet physically removed, global world. 

Painfully negotiating their status between art and journalism, McCullin’s photographs tested the limits of war photography. What is legitimate for a photographer to capture? To what extent and with what purpose can photography sublimate documentation? Compared with the savage use of shock photography in today’s media, McCullin’s work appears as a painful, restless confrontation with the ethics of photography.  

In its most touching moments, McCullin reveals what pictures published for the world to be seen had meant for one man the moment they were taken. Throughout the documentary, McCullin injects new life into his most iconic photographs by narrating the circumstances in which they were taken. One realises that his work has been a constant juggling between the pragmatism of his craft and the impulses of his emotions. 

Next to those raised by his photographs, McCullin's sober, yet moving voice silently evokes a more personal question: war photographer yes - inevitably - but at what price. McCullin's sensibility sits at the opposite of scandal and shock - his words, as his photographs, have the rare poise, emotion and depth of the earnest observer.

fiamma

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
ban nha mat pho ha noi bán nhà mặt phố hà nội